Sagot :
Hello brainly user! ૮₍ ˃ ⤙ ˂ ₎ა
[tex] \huge{ \rm{Answer:}}[/tex]
Regarding Taxonomy, the science that studies the systematic classification of living beings is correct: D) I and III
[tex] \huge{ \rm{Explanation:}}[/tex]
II - Wrong - For the initial classification of living beings proposed by Linnaeus did not include the protist kingdom, only the Animal Kingdom, the Vegetable Kingdom and the Mineral Kingdom.
IV - Wrong - The question's error is in the order in which the classification system of living beings is presented.
The question states that the order is: Kingdom to Species
However, the statement itself contradicts itself, since it presents the order starting with the species.
Species - Family - Genus - Order - Class - Phylum - Kingdom
#LetTheEarthBreathe
hi brainly user! ૮₍ ˃ ⤙ ˂ ₎ა
⊱┈──────────────────────┈⊰
I-One of the first to seek to know, study and classify living beings was Aristotle, still in the 4th century BC, who ordered animals according to their reproduction and the color of their blood.
CORRECT
II. Initially, Linnaeus proposed the classification of beings into Kingdoms, namely: The Animal Kingdom, the Vegetable Kingdom (already mentioned by Aristotle and Theophrastus), the Mineral Kingdom and the Protists.
INCORRECT
The *protist kingdom* does not enter the classification
III. From the works of Charles Darwin and Wallace, evolutionary characteristics became of great relevance in the classification of species, as well as the common ancestors of beings, fossils of extinct animals.
CORRECT
IV. Currently, the system we use to classify living beings follows a hierarchy that goes from Kingdom to Species.
In this way we have:
Species – Family – Genus – Order – Class – Phylum – Kingdom.
INCORRECT
Note the alternative states that “CURRENTLY” the hierarchy goes from
- Kingdom to species
- Soon it would have to start with:
kingdom-phylum-class-order -genus -family and species, but the alternative starts with “species”.
⊱┈──────────────────────┈⊰
RIGHT ANSWER
- D) I and III
#CarryOnLearning